 | SMS Sebenico has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: August 8, 2017. (Reviewed version). |
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg)
GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:SMS Sebenico/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Peacemaker67 (talk · contribs) 03:09, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
Might as well make it a hat trick.
This article is in good shape. A few comments from me:
- no duplicate links, dabs or redirects
- suggest in an unsuccessful attempt to improve
theher speed.of the design, as the use of design twice jars a bit- Good idea
- suggest mentioning what sort of guns they were, muzzle or breech loaders?
- Fixed
- the gun calibers in the body and infobox don't match, 9 cm vs 87 mm and 7 cm vs 66 mm
- Fixed
- where were the 47 mm QF guns installed?
- Added
- suggest "included the ironclad"
- Good catch
- per the Zara review, I think the image license should be PD-because?
- Yup, fixed there
That's me done, placing on hold for the above to be addressed. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 03:21, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks PM. Parsecboy (talk) 12:06, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
- This article is well-written, verifiable using reliable sources, covers the subject well, is neutral and stable, contains no plagiarism, and is illustrated by an appropriately licensed image with an appropriate caption. Passing. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 04:18, 8 August 2017 (UTC)