 | SMS Spalato has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: August 8, 2017. (Reviewed version). |
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg)
GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:SMS Spalato/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Peacemaker67 (talk · contribs) 09:49, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
This article is in good shape. A few comments:
- No dabs or duplicate links
- categorisation seems sensible
- suggest pointing out that the guns were muzzle-loaders if that was the case
- Done
- the guns in the body and infobox don't match, they are 9 cm in the body and 87 mm in the infobox, and 7cm in the body and 66 mm in the infobox
- Fixed
- suggest linking knots
- It's linked in the design section
- linking ship commissioning
- Done
- suggest stating what sort of ship Radetzky was
- Good idea
- gunnery or artillery school? the terms seem to be used interchangeably, perhaps better to be consistent?
- Done
- when the remaining four 47 mm guns are mentioned, worth stating these were the QF ones, not the bow-mounted one
- Good catch
- the image licensing needs work, shouldn't it be PD-because?
- Yup, fixed.
That's me done. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 09:59, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks again. Parsecboy (talk) 12:03, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
- This article is well-written, verifiable using reliable sources, covers the subject well, is neutral and stable, contains no plagiarism, and is illustrated by an appropriately licensed image with an appropriate caption. Passing. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 04:18, 8 August 2017 (UTC)