Talk:SMS Wacht/GA1

Latest comment: 11 years ago by Dank in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Dank (talk · contribs) 03:18, 24 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Review

  • The toolbox checks out.
  • "an aviso, of the Imperial German Navy": an aviso of the Imperial German Navy
  • "Her crew's crew": ?
  • "three 10.5 cm (4.1 in) K L/35 gun": ... guns
  • Otherwise:
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

Passed. - Dank (push to talk) 23:19, 24 June 2013 (UTC)Reply