Talk:SMS Zähringen/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

---

Once again, this article easily passes GA. I will, however, offer some comments for further expansion and improvement beyond this level

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance:

   One thing I would do during the article is keep the abbreviations consistent. Sometimes they're used for conversions, sometimes they aren't (in vs inch, etc). Pick one and stick with it.

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   The only real issue here is that the article doesn't specify how many bombs she was hit by in 1944. Could you find this out?

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

   If possible, could you find more images than just the one in the infobox?

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   Another well written article, though her obviously limited career makes this a shorter article than some of the other ones you've done in the past.

Reviewer: Cam ^(Chat)(Prof) 23:05, 13 August 2010 (UTC)