Talk:SM U-17 (Austria-Hungary)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Hi! I have elected to review this article against the Good article criteria, and should have my initial comments posted up within the next hour. Cheers, Abraham, B.S. (talk) 04:16, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

Following a review of this article against the GA criteria, I have found no issues that require further clarification or expansion. This article safely meets the GA criteria, and I will be promoting it as such. Congratulations and well done! However, I have left a few points below that may guide you if you wish to further expand this article or bring it further up the quality scale. Cheers, Abraham, B.S. (talk) 04:33, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   Further detail and information on the submarine's battle engagements would be great.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   I presume no image is available of the submarine? If none is available, the infobox will suffice but it would be nice if one was included.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail: