Talk:SM UB-10/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

   Some textual issues, but I've given it a fairly thorough copyedit, and most of it should be solved now.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   A couple of images in the later sections would be nice, but I can't see anything we have available which would work.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail: Shimgray | talk | 18:59, 12 April 2009 (UTC)