Talk:SM UB-16

Latest comment: 15 years ago by Bellhalla in topic GA Review
Good articleSM UB-16 has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Did You Know Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 17, 2009Good article nomineeListed
May 8, 2009WikiProject A-class reviewApproved
February 8, 2010Good topic candidateNot promoted
March 15, 2010Good topic candidatePromoted
August 17, 2024Good topic removal candidateDemoted
Did You Know A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on April 1, 2009.
Current status: Good article

GA Review

edit
This review is transcluded from Talk:SM UB-16/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
  • Well written: Pass
    • One minor issue though:
      • "UB-16 and sister boat UB-17 comprised an order of two submarines ordered - a little redundant
        • How about: "The German Imperial Navy ordered UB-16 and sister boat UB-17 which comprised an order of two submarines ordered…" to make it really redundant? Or I could just change the ordered to placed. :) — Bellhalla (talk) 14:06, 18 March 2009 (UTC)Reply
  • Factually Accurate: Pass
  • Broad in its coverage: Looks good, pass
  • Neutral: I see no issues, pass
  • Stable: Pass

Very nice work, Belhalla. Parsecboy (talk) 21:43, 17 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for taking the time to review the article. — Bellhalla (talk) 14:06, 18 March 2009 (UTC)Reply