Talk:SM UB-6

Latest comment: 15 years ago by Sm8900 in topic article details
Good articleSM UB-6 has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Did You Know Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 10, 2009Good article nomineeListed
February 8, 2010Good topic candidateNot promoted
March 15, 2010Good topic candidatePromoted
August 17, 2024Good topic removal candidateDemoted
Did You Know A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on April 1, 2009.
Current status: Good article

GA Review

edit
This review is transcluded from Talk:SM UB-6/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS):  
    • Use {{"'}} ('") to tweak the presentation of a double-quoted " and '.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  
    All good. Arsenikk (talk) 23:08, 10 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

article details

edit

changed one UK ship article link. --Steve, Sm8900 (talk) 18:56, 1 April 2009 (UTC)Reply