Talk:SR V class/GA1

Latest comment: 16 years ago by Malleus Fatuorum in topic GA Reassessment

GA Reassessment

edit

  This article has been reviewed as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force in an effort to ensure all listed Good articles continue to meet the Good article criteria. In reviewing the article, I have found there are some issues that may need to be addressed, listed below. I will check back in seven days. If these issues are addressed, the article will remain listed as a Good article. Otherwise, it may be delisted (such a decision may be challenged through WP:GAR). If improved after it has been delisted, it may be nominated at WP:GAN. Feel free to drop a message on my talk page if you have any questions, and many thanks for all the hard work that has gone into this article thus far.

  • Where books or journals are being used as references, the relevant pages should also be given.
  • It's often easier to separate the References into Notes and Bibliography, to make it easier to provide references to different pages in the same book.
  • "... the last in a long line operating on Southern metals." May be OK for a specialist article, but this is an encyclopedia that ought to be accessible to a general reader.
  • What is the source for the information given in the table in Naming the locomotives?
  • Imperial to metric conversions are given in the infobox, but not in the article body.
  • The two pictures in the Gallery should be incorporated into the article body.
  • "It represented the last utilisation of this wheel arrangement in Britain, and was regarded as the most powerful class of 4-4-0 in Britain, and possibly the world." Extraordinary claims need extaordinary sources, but this uncited statement in the lead is not supported by anything in the article itself.

--Malleus Fatuorum (talk) 21:55, 4 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Done, and created own page for locomotive details. Once again, this is another article that I shall work on in future. --Bulleid Pacific (talk) 15:37, 11 August 2008 (UTC)Reply