Talk:SS Conte Verde

Learn more about this page

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the SS Conte Verde article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Shipwrecks Start‑class

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Shipwrecks, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of shipwreck-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ShipwrecksWikipedia:WikiProject ShipwrecksTemplate:WikiProject ShipwrecksShipwreck articles

Start

This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Shipwreck-related priority open tasks:

To Do

Lady Elizabeth (1879)
- Clean up typos Currently working on it-----Completed!
- Improve grammar
- Add any additions if needed Still adding more information
- Discuss desired additions -None

Military history: Maritime / Asian / European / Italian / Japanese / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	Asian military history task force
	European military history task force
	Italian military history task force (c. 500–present)
	Japanese military history task force
	World War II task force

Football Start‑class Low‑importance

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

1930 FIFA World Cup

Latest comment: 17 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Is this the same boat that transported the Romanian, Czech, Belgian, and French delegations from Europe to Montevideo for the 1930 FIFA World Cup? --ChaChaFut 00:24, 12 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Why yes, that would be this one. I will work it into this article and provide necessary wikilinks. Note, however, that the Czech did not make the crossing; rather, the FIFA website indicates that the Yugoslav team participated. --Bossi (talk ;; contribs) 02:01, 12 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Yes, it is Yugoslavia, not Czechoslovakia. Sorry! - ~~Also, I believe it stopped by to pick up the Brazilian team.~~ --ChaChaFut - nevermind, you already added this both here and on the tournament's article. Very good! --ChaChaFut 03:18, 12 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Heh, I very nearly forgot it :P --Bossi (talk ;; contribs) 04:41, 12 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Add topic