Talk:SS West Cheswald/GA1

GA Review

Hi! I will be reviewing this article for GA, and should have the full review up within a couple of hours. Dana boomer (talk) 20:18, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

   • In the Arctic convoy section, you say "Her closest class occurred". I'm not sure what this is supposed to say, or I'd change it :)
     • I don't know what sort of brain lock-up occurred there. It should have said "her closest call occurred". Now fixed. — Bellhalla (talk) 20:59, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
       • I was pretty sure it was something like this, but I figured it was probably better that you made sure :) Dana boomer (talk) 21:00, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Just one minor prose issue to be addressed before I pass this article for GA, so I'm putting it on hold. Drop me a note if you have any questions. Dana boomer (talk) 20:35, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

Reply above. — Bellhalla (talk) 20:59, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

Everything looks good now, so I'm passing the article. Dana boomer (talk) 21:00, 15 September 2008 (UTC)