 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
 | A member of the Guild of Copy Editors, Stfg, reviewed a version of this article for copy editing on 21 July 2012. However, a major copy edit was inappropriate at that time because of the issues specified below, or the other tags now found on this article. Once these issues have been addressed, and any related tags have been cleared, please tag the article once again for {{copyedit}}. The Guild welcomes all editors with a good grasp of English. Visit our project page if you are interested in joining! |
Requested move
edit- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
No consensus to move. Vegaswikian (talk) 19:27, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
ST14 → Matriptase – I don't understand why matriptase is under 'ST14'... are genes and their encoded proteins meant to have separate articles or be included together under one? If the latter is the case, I urge the use of matriptase for this article - as a significant protease involved in maintenance of hydration in the skin, the majority of literature reference the protein name rather than the gene, I highly doubt many people are aware that "ST14" is its gene and are likely to be searching for matriptase in the first place... KingMunch (talk) 11:48, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose. Instead create good stubs at both this article (which is a bit of a mess) and at matriptase. Both are important topics in their own right. Andrewa (talk) 04:31, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.