Talk:Sable Communications of California v. FCC

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States courts and judges, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States federal courts, courthouses, and United States federal judges on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United States courts and judgesWikipedia:WikiProject United States courts and judgesTemplate:WikiProject United States courts and judgesUnited States courts and judges articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

U.S. Supreme Court cases

	This article is part of WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases, a collaborative effort to improve articles related to Supreme Court cases and the Supreme Court. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.U.S. Supreme Court casesWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesTemplate:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesU.S. Supreme Court articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wikipedia Ambassador Program assignment

This article is the subject of an educational assignment at Michigan State University supported by WikiProject United States Public Policy and the Wikipedia Ambassador Program during the 2011 Spring term. Further details are available on the course page.

Above message substituted from {{WAP assignment}} on 14:11, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

Feedback

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Great job so far. I'm not sure if you noticed, but your page is in the "what's hot" section on the USPPI leaderboard at the moment. Looking forward to the lab today, should be productive.

Some suggestions:

1) I would like to see some interaction with you online mentor on this discussion page.

2) Please refer to the court case directly as often as possible. The language is pretty approachable, so it shouldn't be too difficult to really get some important details in the article.

3) Make sure to include sections on "obscenity" and "indecency." A quick discussion of the Miller Test would also be useful.

Let me know if you have any questions. Jaobar (talk) 16:29, 31 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Suggestions.

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Greetings, everyone! I deeply apologize for not posting here sooner; I misunderstood what I was supposed to be doing, but Jaobar has made things a little clearer.

Looking over the article at this time, it is off to a good start, but from looking at its current content, I can see a few things which could be improved:

The article could be wikified, with the addition of more internal links throughout.
The article should be added to at least one category; I would suggest looking at existing articles on individual court cases in the United States, to get an idea of what categories it would best fit into.
(This one might not need fixing) I think the words in the cited sources which are all in capital font could be rewritten in normal form, but this may be unnecessary; I'm not sure.

Overall, I second Jaobar's statement that this article has much potential! Wilhelmina Will (talk) 04:32, 1 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

History section

Looks good, but I suggest that commas be added in the following instances: "...anyone under 18 or who had not given consent.", "...between 9:00 p.m. and 8:00 a.m. and receive payment...", and "...in 1985 the FCC began...". After the times and numbers given in these instances, per the manual of style for prose, a comma should be placed. Also, if there are any names, words or titles which could be relevantly linked, it might be good to do so. Wilhelmina Will (talk) 20:52, 21 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Add topic