Talk:Sacha Sacket
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
Photo?
editDoes anyone have a public domain photo of this guy? It'd surely be nice. 211.232.214.165 22:01, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
Removal of copyrighted material
editLarge portions of this article had been taken directly from the biography at the subject's official site. For reasons of copyright, this material had to be removed. Please feel free to rewrite these sections in accordance with Wikipedia policies. Thanks. --Metropolitan90 06:31, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
>>>> Well, it's been over a month and no material added? You're not going to just cut and run, buddy. Are you? What I hate most about Wiki deletionists is that they almost never have anything to add. They just delete as if that solves the problem somehow. There should be a rule written somewhere that if you delete, you have to not only give a reason why but fix the damn page if no one else will! All of that blanked out space just looks plain hideous! 76.171.53.59 03:45, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
- Actually deleting copyright material is what we're suppose to do. There's no reason you can't use that same material and rewrite in your own words. Even a few sentences is a start. Benjiboi 11:00, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
- I agree with 76.171.53.59. If you delete something substantial, you should have something to add. Leaving the page blank just looks rather tacky. Yakkowackdot (talk) 16:23, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
- Such is wikilife. Deletionists are within their right to delete material just as inclusionists have the right to add material. Use the history revisions and see what was deleted, rewrite it to avoid copyright and move on. It's usually easier to simply fix it yourself then compell someone to do something their not into. If you really feel Metropolitan90 has some obligation to re-add material, which I don't, then talk to them directly. Benjiboi 19:15, 6 February 2008 (UTC)