This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Sacisaurus article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
A fact from Sacisaurus appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 12 December 2006. The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Screw-up
editThis article was originally at Sacisaur. I had never moved a page before, and had just discovered the Redirect function, and in my blunt enthusiasm, I did the wrong procedure, which is to copy and paste the main article. Unfortunately, this left the original history behind. Here is the original history, for reference. It was started by Vicomtevalmont, which explains my cryptic remark in the history page: it was preexisting, and appears to have originally been written in a language other than English. Vicomtevalmont deserves the credit for starting it, and Dinoguy2 deserves the credit for bringing it up to snuff; I just tried to bring it into line with the rest of the dinosaur-related articles.J. Spencer 05:16, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
- It's no big deal, actually. These things happen. There's no need to apologise. Everyone has done something like this. Just keep on editing! :) Firsfron of Ronchester 07:48, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
Notes?
editWhy is there a source cited within the article using the <ref></ref> tag, but there is no section showing it? J Milburn 18:06, 12 December 2006 (UTC)