Talk:Sacramento Theatre Company
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Sacramento Theatre Company article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Wikify Please
editThis page is deperately in need of a complete re-write and a more neutral tone. It comes across like a pamplet for the theatre. --Amadscientist 09:35, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
This has been done.
Eaglet or Eagle theatre?
editThis article twice referes to the Eaglet Theatre. What? Are you perhaps refereing to the Eagle Theater?--Amadscientist 09:46, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
Eaglet Distinct from Eagle
editThe Eagle was a Gold Rush era theater built mostly of canvas. The Old Eagle Theatre in Old Sacramento was intended as a reconstruction of the original Eagle. The Sacramento Civic Rep, under the leadership of Eleanor McClatchy, named its Eaglet Theatre in tribute to the original Eagle. The Sacramento Theater Company mainstage descends from the Eaglet, not the Eagle. Conigliarodundee 15:05, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
- Thank you very much. I was not sure if that was a typo and could not find verification!--Amadscientist 09:30, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
Copy Paste, Advert tone
editAlmost the entirety of the article is copy and pasted from the official website, as seen here. The article is outside my usual wheelhouse and I only stumbled onto the problem by following a problem IP editor (which is kind of funny actually since I've worked at STC before). SO I leave it to regular watchers to fix. Millahnna (talk) 01:22, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
This has been done. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BobbyeJo11 (talk • contribs) 18:22, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
Page Edited.
editEverything has been updated and changed to fit Wikipedia standards. The language has also be clarified
Copyright problem removed
editPrior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: link to source. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and according to fair use may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. BobbyeJo11 (talk) 18:08, 15 October 2014 (UTC)