Talk:Sacred Relics (Topkapı Palace)
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Sacred Relics (Topkapı Palace) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Which Muslims?
editNot all Muslims believe this, so the article should say which do and do not. Superm401 - Talk 20:44, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
List of items
editSome of the items in Istanbul are apparently:
- The Holy Mantle
- The Honored Standard
- First Manuscripts of Quranic Verses
- The Letters Of Prophet Muhammad
- The Sacred Seal
- The sacred Strands of Hair
- The Prophet's Footprint
- The Sacred Sandals
- The Bow Of the Prophet
- The Holy Tooth
- The staff Of Prophet Muhammad
- The staff Of Moses
- The Cooking Vessel Of The Prophet Abraham
- The Turban of the Prophet Joseph
- The Prophet John's (John the Baptist) Forearm and a Fragment Of His Skull
- The Keys and Locks of the Kaba
- The water Bag used during the restoration of the Tomb of the Prophet
- Covers Of Kaba and the tomb of the prophet
- Soil form the Grave of Prophet Muhammad
- The Prayer Rug and Bridal Veil of Fatimah al-Zahra
- The scarf of Aisha bint Abu Bakr
- Sword Of The Prophet
- Sword Of Abu bakr al-Siddiq
- Sword Of Umar ibn al-Khattab
- Sword Of Uthman ibn Affan
- Sword Of Ali ibn Abu Talib
- A Piece of a Mantle Attributed to Husayn ibn Ali
- A Piece of Earth from Karbala
according to the book "Sacred Trusts". Gryffindor 23:37, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
Letters
editLetters are highly unlikely as that person Mohammed - so far - has been proven to have been illiterate. No writing, no letters. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2003:45:4904:DF83:7DB2:1550:3DE3:49A8 (talk) 23:54, 9 July 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Sacred Relics (Topkapı Palace). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080405075311/http://www.topkapisarayi.gov.tr/eng/enderunavlusu.html to http://www.topkapisarayi.gov.tr/eng/enderunavlusu.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:34, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
Authenticity?
editThere should be some discussion of authenticity of the relics. This is normal for all relics in every religion. Fig (talk) 20:26, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
- @Fig wright Agreed. The supposed sword of David is almost laughably anachronistic, and has more in common with Arabian swords of the early 2nd millennium AD than anything from the early 1st BC Canaan. Rorysparshott (talk) 22:16, 21 October 2023 (UTC)