Talk:Sadiq Sanjrani
Latest comment: 6 years ago by SheriffIsInTown in topic Care to explain...
 | A fact from Sadiq Sanjrani appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 6 April 2018 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.This page is about a politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. For that reason, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
8th chairman
editWhy would someone remove the ordinal number? --Saqib (talk) 15:08, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
- In my opinion the ordinal number do not need to appear again and again in the article, info box is good enough but I let it stay after comparing with other articles such as Donald Trump, for example. Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 11:54, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
Un-encyclopedic?
editHi @SheriffIsInTown: This is concerning your removal of some edits. One lesser-known politician with no prior legislative experience becomes Chairman of the Senate out of nowhere. I'm curious why is that not encyclopedic? Maybe wording was not perfect? In my opinion, this passage easily passes WP:10YT and is informative from encyclopedic POV. Whats your thoughts? --Saqib (talk) 10:51, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
- I changed the wording and restored the content, before it appeared as if it was a nickname for him! Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 11:56, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
Care to explain...
edit...why you removing some basic information such as is a Pakistani politician? @Ridhej.dhhes:. --Saqib (talk) 08:35, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
- See Donald Trump, the basic info is missing. It can be wrote in this way. Every article can’t be the way you want it. Let others edit as well.--Ridhej.dhhes (talk) 08:42, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
- We do not go by examples here on Wikipedia. By the way, Why don't you stop socking and ask your original account to be unblocked? --Saqib (talk) 08:45, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
- @Ridhej.dhhes: Donald Trump is not a good example here, Barack Obama and Nancy Pelosi are (check those), every two individuals are different, if you can better explain your objection to describing him as a politician then I might be able to give a counter argument otherwise removal of information just on the basis of another article is not a good idea. Can you please stop removing that same information from other articles as I might tend to report you for disruptive editing. Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 10:23, 20 June 2018 (UTC)