Talk:Saegusa–Ito oxidation

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Saegusa-Ito oxidation/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 21:24, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: none found.

Linkrot: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 21:25, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

Checking against GA criteria

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   The article is well enough written that I can follow it with my knowledge of Chemistry from an A-level over forty years ago.

   It follows the Chemistry project guidelines and Manual of Style.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   References appear to be RS and check out. I assume good faith for those which I cannot access. Citations follow Wikipedia:SCG

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   As far as I can determine, it is broad and focussed.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   I note that it is suggested on the file pages that .png images should be rendered as vector graphics, but that is not a GA requirement.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   I believe that this passes muster. I am happy to list it as a good article, congratulations! Jezhotwells (talk) 21:40, 1 March 2011 (UTC)