Talk:Saidiya Hartman
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
editThis article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 2 September 2020 and 9 December 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Paril.patel0306.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 08:32, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Frank Wilderson
editI am perplexed by the paragraph that claims Hartman's work "caught the attention of" Frank Wilderson. In the first place, this assertion seems to suggest that Hartman's work was relatively unknown before Wilderson encountered it. In the second place, it hardly seems surprising that Hartman's work came to his attention, since he was a graduate student at Berkeley while she was teaching there and sat on his dissertation committee. In the third place, Hartman's work has been engaged with rather widely and by scholars in a number of fields. A more effective strategy for illustrating the reception of her work would be to address that range as documented by the Arts and Humanities Citation Index or a survey of Humanities book reviews. Additionally, I do not understand the phrases "well-known for setting groundwork" and "this criticism examines unflinching paradigmatic analysis on the structures of modernity." I think a re-write of this paragraph is in order. ~~MS — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.231.40.142 (talk) 14:42, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Saidiya Hartman. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090626031732/http://www.pbs.org/kcet/tavissmiley/archive/200701/20070126_hartman.html to http://www.pbs.org/kcet/tavissmiley/archive/200701/20070126_hartman.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100627060618/http://www.columbia.edu/cu/irwag/pdf-files/vol27aug08.pdf to http://www.columbia.edu/cu/irwag/pdf-files/vol27aug08.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:22, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Structure
editThere are a few sections here that could benefit from collective work through being streamlined or being edited to reduce issues with the overall structure of this entry.
The "Theoretical Concepts" section and both of the "Contributions to" sections cover similar ground, raising the question of what justifies these sections as being structurally distinct. With some reworking, the "Contributions to" sections could be incorporated into "Theoretical Concepts," perhaps as subheads. Alternately, the "Theoretical Concepts" section could be eliminated, and its material could be incorporated into the "Contributions to" sections. The section on "Wayward Lives..." could be similarly changed.
The "Promised Land" section seems to be intended to discuss an aspect of Hartman's work, but without introductory or contextualizing elements in its opening and body sentences (i.e., "In Lose Your Mother, Hartman argues..."), it reads more like a segment of original scholarly work that is summarizing Hartman's work as part of its own analysis. In general, though, this section may be best incorporated into the "Contributions to the Understanding of Slavery" section (or sub-section, per above), perhaps retitling that that section to something like "Contributions to the Understanding of Slavery and the African Diaspora."
Add entry for Scenes of subjection
editSadiya Hartman's book, Scenes pf Subjection, is a very important scholarly work, entitled to its own wikipedia entry. Mokshafarmsanctuary (talk) 22:35, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
- @Mokshafarmsanctuary, are you interested in helping develop such a page? I see you’re new and I’d be glad to help you set it up, but I don’t currently have the bandwidth to write it myself. I agree there are plenty of sources from which one could write such a page tho, so if you’re interested I encourage you to be bold! Innisfree987 (talk) 22:37, 4 December 2023 (UTC)