Talk:Sailor Mouth

Hi

Hey everyone! Well, I have recreated this article with sources, which is not a bad start for enriching the season articles for SpongeBob. This article appears to be in pretty good shape, and everyone is welcome to improve it so that perhaps it can be submitted for GA review (meaning we will have TWO Good Articles!). A suggestion: does anybody have any screenshots or pictures of the series' cast and crew to snazz this article up a bit! Thanks, and hail the SpongeBob WikiProject! --Phil A. Fry (talk) 12:47, 04 October 2009 (UTC)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Sailor Mouth/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: EditorE (talk · contribs) 16:13, 3 July 2013 (UTC) Alright. I going to review this, so here we go.

Infobox

• Looks good
  • Thanks! :)

Lead

• The second paragraph in the lead just isn't good on itself should be with the first paragraph in the lead.
  •  Fixed
• "The episode received positive reviews from television critics," I don't see a lot of critical reviews in the Reception section, other than the About.com source listing the episode as one of the Top 10 spongebob episodes, so I don't think we should say that it got reviews from critics.
  •  Done

Plot

• "he reads some of the words written on the dumpster." Wait, what dumpster? It's best if we didn't say "on the dumpster".
  •  Fixed
• All the "swear" and "swears" in this section should be changed to "swear word" or "swear words".
  •  Fixed
• "he reads some of the words written on the dumpster. SpongeBob then asks Patrick what it is and Patrick says that the word is a "sentence enhancer."" What's "it"? One of the words that is a swear word or the words on the dumpster Spongebob read? We should also introduce that some of the words Patrick and Spongebob said were a swear word, before saying that Spongebob "walks into the Krusty Krab and says the swear [this should be "Swear word"] to Patrick and then over the intercom."
  •  Fixed
• "Mr. Krabs stops their gibberish explanations, and takes SpongeBob and Patrick outside and returns with cans of paint." How about you say that Mr. Krabs "makes them paint as punishment" instead of "returns with cans of paint."
  •  Done

Production

• "Series creator Stephen Hillenburg have" should be "Series creator Stephen Hillenburg has".
  •  Done
• "Tibbitt later reprised his role in the third season episode "Mid-Life Crustacean";[2] however, for reasons unknown, Tibbitt was replaced by SpongeBob SquarePants cast member Sirena Irwin for the episode fourth season episode "Enemy In-Law" and each of Mrs. Krabs' subsequent appearances.[3][4][5]" Whoa, Whoa, Whoa, Whoa, Whoa, Whoa, Whoa! Do we really need to go into more detail on the character rather than the episode? This part of the article should be removed.
  •  Done

Reception

• "In a report titled Wolves in Sheep's Clothing," This should be :According to a report titled Wolves in Sheep's Clothing,"
  •  Done

References;

• Ref #1: The date of the article should be mention in this citation.
  •  Done
• Ref #7: The date of the article should be mention in this citation.
  •  Done

Hopefully, the issues will be addressed so I look at this article again and see if I can pass it yet. Great work, though. EditorE (talk) 16:13, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

Thank you so much EditorE on taking time to review this article to GA. I hope the article is all in shape to pass your and, of course, the GA standards. Thanks again and have a nice day! :) Mediran (t • c) 10:53, 4 July 2013 (UTC)

Your welcome. Passing, here we go! EditorE (talk) 14:31, 4 July 2013 (UTC)

Actually

This episode is the 68th episode overall =] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.174.26.84 (talk) 03:28, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

How many times the characters said the swear words?

I'm very interested about the amount of swearing in a SpongeBob Squarepants episode called "Sailor Mouth" (the main article of this episode is on the "Article" tab in the top of this page). But unfortunately, I can't found that on the episode's article. I don't want to watch this episode due to lots of censor bleeps (a sound that I dislikes), you may count them by watch that episode. If you count them all, please tell me on this thread. Thank you!
P.S. - If you don't know what "censor bleeps" used on that episode, the swearing is represented by a dolphin noise (in the final part that Mama Krabs says a 14th swear word, it's represented by a honking sound).--Ijoe2003 (talk) 08:18, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

Expand the "Reception" section further

Hello, I came to ask if the "Reception" section could be expanded further, since it only has three reviews, which is insufficient for a GA. First, the About.com source should be removed, since it is considered unreliable, and second, I suggest adding the following sources for greater compression: BuzzFeed, Screen Rant, MovieWeb, and CBR to expand that section further. In general, the article has aged well, I only ask that these references be added. So I call on user @Zingo156:, who has contributed to SpongeBob SquarePants articles, to solve the problem. 2801:1CA:E:1411:7108:1CA1:C0EF:44CD (talk) 18:54, 23 August 2024 (UTC)

I'll get on it! Zingo156 (talk) 16:27, 24 August 2024 (UTC)

@Zingo156: I'm glad you're improving the article so it can keep its GA status. Here I provide two more sources for the IMDb section (using Collider as a reference) and this one. So what do the sources look like? And do you think they're adequate? Let me know. 2801:1CA:E:1411:62C:D6C:9D57:C071 (talk) 20:41, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

Yes they are adequate.I am currently working on the article right now btw. Zingo156 (talk) 07:53, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

@Zingo156: First of all I have to thank you for the additions you made, it has really been very helpful. But as a last favor could you add the IMDb (using CBR as a source). I don't know if you consider it reliable or not, but tell me what you think about it. 2801:1CA:E:1411:BC4E:11BE:D31:294B (talk) 19:13, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

I am getting to it! Zingo156 (talk) 06:03, 13 September 2024 (UTC)

Done! Is it ok? Zingo156 (talk) 17:22, 17 September 2024 (UTC)

@Zingo156: With all the changes added I could now say that the section is now of very good quality. So that's why I'm closing this discussion. 2801:1CA:E:1411:62C:D6C:9D57:C071 (talk) 18:30, 23 September 2024 (UTC)