Talk:Saint-Gaudens double eagle

Pronounciation

How do you say "Gaudens"? gawdins? go-dan's? Something else? 76.247.47.141 16:27, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

I'm also a bit curious as to this - any ideas? Connormah (talk) 03:30, 12 September 2010 (UTC)

When I have heard it pronounced, it is the first way. Not sure if that is correct though. Have you checked the sculptor's article?--Wehwalt (talk) 09:50, 12 September 2010 (UTC)

Citeless weasel words...

...In the first paragraph, of a featured article? "It is considered by many the most beautiful of U.S. coins."  ?? TJSwoboda (talk) 04:34, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

It's referenced further down in the article. (Yeoman, p. 270) - Snarkibartfast (talk) 10:41, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

Correct, see WP:LEAD. Statements in the lede are not to be cited if the fact is repeated and cited in the body of the article.--Wehwalt (talk) 12:44, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

Ah, okay. Sorry to come off half-cocked. TJSwoboda (talk) 17:18, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

Common confusion.--Wehwalt (talk) 17:28, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

Merge (?)

Hello, I'm Burmiester, a beaurocrat with the Numismatics project. I'd like to raise the discussion on why there is a motion to merge this page into another article.

This is wrong.

It's plain as day to see that this article is well developed and lengthy enough to avoid a merging. Get back to me with responses, please. (Burmiester (talk) 15:28, 11 September 2013 (UTC))

What other article? We have well-developed articles on both the Liberty Head (Coronet) and Saint-Gaudens double eagles, this is in fact a featured article. There is no need for a merge.--Wehwalt (talk) 15:38, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

Ah, I see, it's on the WP:NUMIS tasks you can do. That should probably be removed, it has been sitting here for years very likely. I worked on this article three or four years ago. It is probably from before that, when we had a very shoddy article on this and possibly a better one on double eagle and no doubt a merge was thought of, but now we have strong articles for the two types of double eagles.--Wehwalt (talk) 21:53, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

Now a FA in Chinese Wikipedia

I have translated this article to Chinese Wikipedia here and promoted to FA status, and I want to thank User:Wehwalt for his effort to write this amazing article. --Jarodalien (talk) 08:28, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Like ---Another Believer _(Talk) 00:00, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Thank you for your efforts! After spending that time in China last fall and barely learning a word, I know how great a feat it is!--Wehwalt (talk) 06:00, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Saint-Gaudens double eagle. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111213074349/http://news.yahoo.com/jury-us-govt-rightfully-seized-1933-gold-coins-194706140.html to https://news.yahoo.com/jury-us-govt-rightfully-seized-1933-gold-coins-194706140.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:09, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Saint-Gaudens double eagle. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150615152530/http://www.coinworld.com/news/court-rules-in-favor-of-langbord-family-in-1933-double-eagle-case.html to http://www.coinworld.com/news/court-rules-in-favor-of-langbord-family-in-1933-double-eagle-case.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150804012248/http://www.coinworld.com/insights/1933-gold-double-eagle-case-continues-as-court-vacates-earlier-ruling.html to http://www.coinworld.com/insights/1933-gold-double-eagle-case-continues-as-court-vacates-earlier-ruling.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:36, 27 January 2018 (UTC)