Talk:Saint-Michel Boulevard (Montreal)
Latest comment: 6 years ago by Peter Horn in topic RfD followup
This is the talk page of a redirect that targets the page: • Saint-Michel, Montreal Because this page is not frequently watched, present and future discussions, edit requests and requested moves should take place at: • Talk:Saint-Michel, Montreal |
This article was nominated for deletion on 5 October 2018. The result of the discussion was redirect. |
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
This redirect is written in Canadian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, centre, travelled, realize, analyze) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
Redirect to wrong boulevard
edit@Godsy: Careful old chap. The Soft redirect is meant to be to the corresponding boulevard in Montreal and not to a boulevard in Paris Peter Horn User talk 20:20, 18 September 2018 (UTC) Peter Horn User talk 20:29, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
- Because of this confusion, this article m eventually have to become Saint Michel Boulevard (Montreal) Peter Horn User talk 20:32, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
- Or else a disambiguation page needs to be created because Saint Michel Boulevard is in Montreal. Peter Horn User talk 20:36, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
- @Peter Horn: I started a discussion about the soft redirects to French streets (I had planned to anyway but did not have time earlier), see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 September 18#Saint Michel Boulevard. Warm regards, — Godsy (TALKCONT) 23:08, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
- Or else a disambiguation page needs to be created because Saint Michel Boulevard is in Montreal. Peter Horn User talk 20:36, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
RfD followup
edit@Godsy, Matthew hk, Peter Horn, Tavix, Bearcat, and Arms & Hearts: This page was converted from a soft redirect to an article during the RfD without that being noted in the discussion to which you contributed. Thryduulf (talk) 14:17, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
- But not a good article, I see. Bearcat (talk) 14:19, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
- Better than no article at all. What is bad can in due time be improved. Peter Horn User talk 18:52, 27 September 2018 (UTC)