Saint Anthony's Chapel (Pittsburgh) is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to the Catholic Church. For more information, visit the project page.CatholicismWikipedia:WikiProject CatholicismTemplate:WikiProject CatholicismCatholicism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pittsburgh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pittsburgh and its metropolitan area on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PittsburghWikipedia:WikiProject PittsburghTemplate:WikiProject PittsburghPittsburgh articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania articles
Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
In the "history" section there is mention of several of the more notable items in the collection. Would it be appropriate to add mention that these objects are purported to be this or that? Even the Vatican itself is suspicious of many purported relics. PurpleChez (talk) 18:06, 2 August 2018 (UTC)Reply
I think that's a fair adjustment of language. I will make the change. I am also going to remove the reference to Saint Caesarius, whose relics are not notable in the collection. Someone keeps adding in the reference, which I find misleading regarding the status of this relic. — AJDStalk03:49, 17 June 2020 (UTC)Reply