This redirect falls within the scope of WikiProject Folklore, a WikiProject dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of the topics of folklore and folklore studies. If you would like to participate, you may edit the redirect attached to this page, or visit the project's page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to discussion.FolkloreWikipedia:WikiProject FolkloreTemplate:WikiProject FolkloreFolklore
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Martial arts. Please use these guidelines and suggestions to help improve this article. If you think something is missing, please help us improve them!Martial artsWikipedia:WikiProject Martial artsTemplate:WikiProject Martial artsMartial arts
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 01:01, December 10, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related
Latest comment: 15 years ago4 comments4 people in discussion
The obvious question is whether this should be a standalone article. Previously it's been merged into the article on the character. I have to admit, sources that discuss the cartoon in general and not this fictional sword in particular do not help much, in my view. So, hopefully people are working on this with an eye toward making that call, rather than with an approach of more-pages-are-always-better. Friday(talk)15:39, 19 September 2009 (UTC)Reply
On first inspection, this does look like a better candidate for a merge because it's almost too specific for there to be significant coverage. I'll have a longer look for more sourcing, but I think talking about merge targets is probably a good plan. Fritzpoll (talk) 09:40, 21 September 2009 (UTC)Reply