Talk:Salé

Salé pirates in America

Could we please have some sort of source for this statement ? It sounds a bit far-fetched but may be right - what is the evidence ?Boulet rouge (talk) 21:23, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• Monuments de Salé.png

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:07, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

Merge proposal

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result of this discussion was: merged. R Prazeres (talk) 05:30, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

---

Propose merging Medina of Salé into Salé.

This is a good-faith but unnecessary WP:SPLIT from the main article, Salé. The latter, which currently lacks a section about its historical heritage, could easily cover any information that would be relevant here, which would be more helpful to readers. Salé is not as large or as complex as other medina cities, so the amount of information to cover here and the availability of reliable sources is more limited. Even in the case of Marrakesh, which has a much larger and UNESCO-designated medina, there has been no consensus to create an article about the medina separately from the main article about the city. R Prazeres (talk) 02:56, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

PS: There are a few other short, poorly-sourced "medina" articles like this (e.g. Medina of Taza) which I believe should also be merged, but I'm starting with this one for now. R Prazeres (talk) 03:07, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

It's April and I nearly forgot about this. Consider this one last reminder to comment. If there are no objections, I'll perform the merge in the near future. R Prazeres (talk) 04:31, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

I'm all for the merge of this article, per your points. Carlstak (talk)

Alright, I'm closing this and performing the merge. After looking over the other article again, I see it lacks citations for most of the (brief) content and its only significant source appears to be the city's own website, which may not count as a WP:RS, among other issues. So I won't copy anything over. But I've just added a summary of the city's main historic landmarks here ([1]) that is more comprehensive anyways (minus the full list of gates, which I couldn't verify elsewhere). This new section can be expanded as needed. R Prazeres (talk) 05:29, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.