Talk:Salahuddin Ahmed (Cox's Bazar politician)
Latest comment: 8 months ago by 2pou in topic Requested move 20 March 2024
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
On 20 March 2024, it was proposed that this article be moved from Salahuddin Ahmed (politician) to Salahuddin Ahmed (Cox's Bazar politician). The result of the discussion was moved. |
Requested move 20 March 2024
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. WP:RMNOMIN (closed by non-admin page mover) 2pou (talk) 16:49, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
Salahuddin Ahmed (politician) → Salahuddin Ahmed (Cox's Bazar politician) – Dab from Salahuddin Ahmed (Chapai Nawabganj politician) (and Salah Uddin Ahmed) * Pppery * it has begun... 15:00, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support the Cox's Bazar politician has 156 views but the Chapai Nawabganj politician has 9 and Salah Uddin Ahmed has 25[[1]]. Crouch, Swale (talk) 18:16, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.