This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
A fact from Salem witchcraft trial (1878) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 31 October 2010 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Occult, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to the occult on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OccultWikipedia:WikiProject OccultTemplate:WikiProject OccultOccult articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Latest comment: 11 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
I'd like to move this to Salem witchcraft trial (1878), following sources such as Caroline Fraser in God's Perfect Child (1999). Very few sources (that I can see) call it the Ipswich witchcraft trial, and many of those have taken it from this article. Does anyone mind if I move it? SlimVirgin(talk)16:29, 30 January 2013 (UTC)Reply
A Google books search shows no mention of a "second Salem witchcraft trial" or its variations. There is only one reference to "Ipswich witchcraft trial" and its variations (Maggi Smith-Dalton, A History of Spiritualism and the Occult in Salem: The Rise of Witch City, p. 146). I can find just three to "Salem witchcraft trial of 1878" or variations thereof (Ruth A. Tucker, Another Gospel: Cults, Alternative Religions, and the New Age Movement, p. 159; Robert Peel, Mary Baker Eddy: the Concord Years, 1889-1908: A Chronology, p. 40; Louise A. Smith, Mary Baker Eddy: Discoverer and Founder of Christian Science, p. 75). Based on this limited information, I see no reason not to change it. - Tim1965 (talk) 21:11, 30 January 2013 (UTC)Reply
Thanks. There's also Caroline Fraser, God's Perfect Child, Metropolitan Books, 1999, p. 69; she describes it as "the case that came be known as the Salem Witchcraft Trial of 1878." I'll go ahead and make the move. SlimVirgin(talk)23:14, 31 January 2013 (UTC)Reply
Converted footnotes to use templates that link to the bibliography.
Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
I've changed the bibliography to use the {{Cite book}}-templates, and changed the footnotes to use the {{harvnb}} template. This makes it possible for the reader of the article to click the footnote and be taken directly to the relevant spot in the bibliography. Should anyone wish to use this in future articles or help change other articles where the footnotes are plaintext, read Help:Shortened footnotes. Respectfully, InsaneHacker (💬) 14:39, 18 April 2017 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 9 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This is a dismissed civil case. Not even a trial. A crazy lady walked in to court and her accusation was dismissed by the court. It was a chuckle story taken with a wink back then. The "references" are a few local books by authors of no note. Calling this a witch trial on that basis is like citing bigfoot as verified by cable TV presentations. This should be labelled as an "Ipswitch witch trial" IN QUOTES to make clear it is a historic reference to a fanciful story. And one about a crazy lady not accusing anyone of being a witch, but rather drawing upon the Christian Scientist set of beliefs that would allow mental powers to affect health of others.
Just labeling it a Salem witch trial with a date in parentheses is a cute thing for schoolboys to do. But it makes it impossible to take this wiki seriously. 162.154.248.143 (talk) 13:55, 5 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
.png){kind=small}
