Talk:Salim Saifullah Khan

Untitled

There is no referrence provided for any of the claim made inthe article. Who is Khan Sahib Faziullah Khan? Never heard of him and it is claimed that he was the biggest Muslim Contractor? No prove or referrence mentioned for any of the statements mentioned in the article.

After citation added, we can look to have the refined edition, then.

This article is nominated for the below mentioned actions.

I assure and challenge that not even a single tag is placed wrong. All who are well known of Pakistan and then Frontier Province's politics will themselves knows the "childish" behaviour of this article.

I wish to re-write this article personally.

Pleqase help me.

There is absoulutely no need for so many tags. For example why would you need multiple cleanup tags? Just use one, same for the verified/unreferenced/etc tags. Adding that many just makes the article unreadable. Also, you don't need to be an admin to remove tags such as cleanup, at least as far as I know. -Aryoc 06:34, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

• do not make objections as the mentioned articles are wrong.who are you that you do not know khan faizullah khan ,he was not only the biggest muslim contractor but also the poineer in india's energy sectors.Khan Fazullah has remained MLA in 1937.check the history of Saifullah family you will learn something in your life.
• refference;Book [THE MARWATS BY SHER MUHAMMAD MOHMAND].

To say that this article was excessively and absurdly overtagged with templates would be an understatement. If you see any problems with this article, please be WP:BOLD and {{sofixit}} rather than engage in graffiti by way of pastel colored boxes. Thanks. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 08:36, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

I've moved the TotallyDisputed and cleanup tags to the article page where they belong, and deleted the others. Matchups 01:31, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Salim Saifullah Khan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060707213816/http://www.pk.emb-japan.go.jp/POLITiCAL/summary_of_exchange_of%20_visits%20_from_Pakistan.htm to http://www.pk.emb-japan.go.jp/POLITiCAL/summary_of_exchange_of%20_visits%20_from_Pakistan.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071009083701/http://www.nation.com.pk/daily/jan-2005/8/columns4.php to http://www.nation.com.pk/daily/jan-2005/8/columns4.php
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071009083701/http://www.nation.com.pk/daily/jan-2005/8/columns4.php to http://www.nation.com.pk/daily/jan-2005/8/columns4.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:45, 23 May 2017 (UTC)