Talk:Salivatory nuclei
Latest comment: 5 years ago by Klbrain in topic Proposed merge with Inferior salivatory nucleus
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
 | The contents of the Inferior salivatory nucleus page were merged into Salivatory nuclei on 8 December 2018. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
| The contents of the Superior salivatory nucleus page were merged into Salivatory nuclei on 8 December 2018. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
Disambiguation
editThis article is really still just a disambiguation page. Since the superior and inferior salivatory nucleus already have articles of their own, the top half needs attention from a medical expert to fill it out. It also needs more current references to verify that this page isn't just an historical oddity, that the information is still current. — Myk Streja [citation needed] 20:51, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
Proposed merge with Inferior salivatory nucleus
editthey are one of only two groups better presented on target page Iztwoz (talk) 08:32, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
- The original point of Salivatory nuclei was to be a disambiguation page. I personally am not comfortable with the changes that have been made here. I think it should be reverted back to >this page<. Any real improvements at this point would only duplicate efforts made to the subject of this message and Superior salivatory nucleus. Iztwoz What do you think? — Myk Streja [citation needed] 14:05, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
- Hello — Myk Streja - it was a disambiguation page to deal with the two similarly named items. This simply doesn't need to be a disambiguation page - two items one superior one inferior. Making a stub instead of a dab page makes things easier for linking and so on. Cannot understand your viewpoint. Historical oddity!!?? Best --Iztwoz (talk) 17:33, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
- Perhaps I misunderstood what you meant by merge. Do you mean for this page to go away? If someone were to search for "Salivatory nuclei" without this page, how would that help? What should replace it? — Myk Streja [citation needed] 18:23, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
- The proposal means to merge the info from both pages to this the target page. This page name would remain and both types superior and inferior would link here. --Iztwoz (talk) 18:32, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
Merger complete. Klbrain (talk) 21:41, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
Proposed merge with Superior salivatory nucleus
editthey are one of only two groups that would be better presented on target page Iztwoz (talk) 08:33, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
- See above. — Myk Streja [citation needed] 14:09, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
- Done