This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
This article was created or improved during the #1day1woman initiative hosted by the Women in Red project in 2023. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in RedWikipedia:WikiProject Women in RedTemplate:WikiProject Women in RedWomen in Red articles
Latest comment: 1 year ago5 comments4 people in discussion
@Rosguill could you please advise me on how to resolve you questioning the notability of the article. Green is an active an published author who has won multiple awards. Only one of the sources is from the author itself (used as a reference for the country where she lives). Martsniez (talk) 09:20, 2 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
The problem is that none of the cited sources discuss Green outside the context of the Half Bad. Further, with the exception of Great British Life, which looks like an unreliable pay-to-play PR publication, none of the sources give any independent biographical information about Green; interviews are a gray area, but when the interviews are written like the ones currently cited from The Guardian and Writing.ie, all of the substantive information is directly attributed to Green, and stretches the definition of independent. Additionally, while it can be a sign that coverage exists and is likely worth including in the article, awards won that are not themselves Wikipedia-notable do not immediately confer notability.
The kinds of sourcing that I would want to see would be news stories with significant information not sourced directly to a quote from the subject (like this), or scholarly books/papers analyzing the significance of the subject's work (like this) signed, Rosguilltalk19:16, 2 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
Hi. Just because an article exists on Wikipedia does not mean it is necessarily a good model to base a new article on. This is called WP:OSE, "Other stuff exists". Wikipedia is monitored by volunteers, so it's not unusual for an inappropriate article to slip through the cracks. Onel5969TT me10:54, 9 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
I disagree and I have moved this back to main space. There are sufficient notable sources and our prime objective is to build an encyclopedia and for that we need to allow artickes to develop. Victuallers (talk) 12:53, 11 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
.jpg){kind=small}
