Talk:Salma (writer)/GA1

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Whiteguru in topic GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Whiteguru (talk · contribs) 05:53, 20 March 2021 (UTC)Reply


Starts GA Review; the review will follow the same sections of the Article. --Whiteguru (talk) 05:53, 20 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

 



Observations

edit
  • Reference 7 is brilliant.
  • Panchayat is better described as a village council. Consider.

Thumbs up icon women are expected to get married and become homemakers, whereas looking after the family should be the joint responsibility of both partners,

Thumbs up icon adds that women need the freedom to choose and act without fear, and that they do not need a man's permission to do so.

  • This woman is likely to be in the public domain for quite some time as author, writer, poet, and champion of women's issues. A recommendation (for consideration) where references have been archived, it is probably useful to use archived references to prevent link rot.

Final

edit
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): follows MOS
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): very well referenced
  3. It is broad in its coverage. considers different reviews, considers different responses from society and culture, yes
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias: for a searing woman author and poet, yes, NPOV
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.: very stable
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate. Yes, CC-by-SA
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions): Yes, CC-by-SA
  7. Overall:

Thumbs up icon Excellent English expression and writing. A well-referenced article.       --Whiteguru (talk) 06:51, 20 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

 

 Passed


The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.