Talk:Salvia

References

Reference #3 requires a user to log in in order to view the material, however there is absolutely no way that I found to create a new account. This can't possibly be the best way to accomplish this, and requiring a user to log in with an account they cannot create effectively eliminates the reference as reliable. Could someone with an account on that server possibly create a PDF of the information? Noddegamra (talk) 05:20, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

That would most likely be a copy-right violation. If the statement is true it would be a significant finding and should have many other sources on the net making this claim - Those could be referenced. Hardyplants (talk) 06:20, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

If you want to get a subscription - use this link: http://www.ebscohost.com Hardyplants (talk) 06:23, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

At the very least, the author should have provided I full citation of the report, as opposed to just giving an unnamed "EBSCO Publishing Service Selection Page" link. I'm strongly considering deleting this link and the statement it supports if I cannot find the original source.--Waxsin (talk) 06:00, 26 June 2008 (UTC)

I've replaced tha reference with four of the first papers which came up on an NIH search of the topic. At least one of them has full text online via PubMed Central (PMC). I didn't do much more than that (in terms of trying to evaluate in any detail what the papers are saying, what other sources are saying, etc). Kingdon (talk) 04:03, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Food and drink Tagging

This article talk page was automatically added with {{WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 11:42, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

Why Doesn't This Article Mention Anything About...

...the powerful hallucinatory side-affects of salvia? You do know that most people use it as a "legal drug", right?--66.177.73.91 (talk) 15:18, 17 September 2009 (UTC)

Did you miss the "For the psychoactive herb see Salvia divinorum" that is on the first line of this article? Drug culture narcissism notwithstanding, Salvia species are in millions of gardens worldwide, not to mention that nearly everyone in the US has consumed common sage as part of their Thanksgiving dinner. Stan (talk) 16:03, 17 September 2009 (UTC)

he was probably high Truth protest (talk) 17:27, 31 March 2024 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Salvia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20050222015817/http://hort.ufl.edu:80/shrubs/SALSPLA.PDF to http://hort.ufl.edu/shrubs/SALSPLA.PDF

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 23:10, 26 January 2016 (UTC)