Talk:Salvia palaestina

Warning: active arbitration remedies

The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:

You must be logged-in and extended-confirmed to edit or discuss this topic on any page (except for making edit requests, provided they are not disruptive)
You may not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any edits related to this topic

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

Further information

The exceptions to the extended confirmed restriction are:

Non-extended-confirmed editors may use the "Talk:" namespace only to make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided they are not disruptive.
Non-extended-confirmed editors may not create new articles, but administrators may exercise discretion when deciding how to enforce this remedy on article creations. Deletion of new articles created by non-extended-confirmed editors is permitted but not required.

With respect to the WP:1RR restriction:

Clear vandalism of whatever origin may be reverted without restriction. Also, reverts made solely to enforce the extended confirmed restriction are not considered edit warring.
Editors who violate this restriction may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offence.

After being warned, contentious topics procedure can be used against any editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process. Contentious topic sanctions can include blocks, topic-bans, or other restrictions.
Editors may report violations of these restrictions to the Arbitration enforcement noticeboard.

If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it here on this talk page first. When in doubt, don't revert!

Regions

Latest comment: 14 years ago7 comments4 people in discussion

This source say Palestine: [1] This source [2] does not contain "west bank", which shows that the sentence added here without any new source; [3]"including what was historically known as Palestine, (which now includes Syria, Israel and the West Bank" is false and not following the sources. Not only is it unsourced, but its also irrelevant for the article, if people want to read about Palestine they can read the Palestine article. --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 21:26, 29 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

We do not to use inaccurate bits of infomation, albeit they are found in RS. We know better on this geographical point than this source does and therefore my version is correct. The old version is confusing with regards to current term usage. Chesdovi (talk) 09:49, 30 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Its not inaccurate, the source says Palestine, the text you added is false. --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 10:36, 30 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

There is no need for repetition here. It is better to name all pertaining countries, as I have done, than to mention "Palestine" as well. The designation of "Palestine" is surplus here. All the pertaining countries are named. Palestine is: "a conventional name used to describe a geographic region between the Mediterranean Sea and the Jordan River and various adjoining lands". Or "as a geographic term, Palestine can refer to "ancient Palestine," an area that today includes Israel and the Palestinian territories, as well as part of Jordan, and some of both Lebanon and Syria." I tried to accommodate the word Palestine, but now think it is not needed at all, whether the source mentions is or not. We don't need to copy everything the source says! Chesdovi (talk) 10:52, 30 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

I support the current version[4] or something like it (in spite of the nasty comments and edit-warring by the IP who changed it). Distribution of plants is based on geographic regions—the use of nation/state names is only a convenience (or inconvenience in this case). This plant was named and described in 1832, based on the then current broadest meaning of "Palestine" as the entire region. Since "Palestine" can mean many things to many people, we need to explain the geographic distribution/meaning that it's referring to. In this case, "a wide area including what was historically known as Palestine, (which now includes Israel, Syria, and the West Bank)" is much more correct than simply saying "Palestine". First Light (talk) 18:25, 31 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Largely agree with First Light, though I wonder whether we could simply parse the wording down to "geographic Palestine". NickCT (talk) 17:40, 4 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

I'm afraid that may be interpreted by some people as the geography covered by the State of Palestine, which is officially called "Palestine". Eliminating the wordiness, in this case, would result in ambiguity. First Light (talk) 03:00, 5 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Add topic