Talk:Sam Fuld

Latest comment: 5 years ago by Leggomygreggo8 in topic why

Former good articleSam Fuld was one of the Sports and recreation good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 10, 2011Good article nomineeListed
November 4, 2016Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article


Tags removed as not supported by the actual article state

edit

I reviewed it, see no evidence of bias whatsoever (all dryly supported by RSs), and the quotation use is within proper bounds, as reflected by GA approval and my review. 2604:2000:E016:A700:5560:828A:F503:4AD8 (talk) 18:12, 4 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

I will not revert your edit again. While I disagree about the neutrality of this article, it did pass a GA review as you stated. The article is on presently being re-assessed for its GA-status, I will leave it the other reviewers to determine where there are too many quotes or if this article is too biased for a GA article. There are other articles in need of more work. --  StarScream1007  ►Talk  18:41, 4 March 2017 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Sam Fuld. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:26, 17 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Sam Fuld. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:28, 15 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

why

edit

The way this article is written, you’d think this is a Hall of Fame player. There was a lot of unnecessary information I removed. It seems more or less fine now, but there was definitely some information within this article I found tedious and completely redundant. Leggomygreggo8 (talk) 06:54, 2 October 2019 (UTC)Reply