Talk:Sam Johnson (activist)
Latest comment: 11 years ago by BDD in topic Requested move
 | A fact from Sam Johnson (activist) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 24 July 2011 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
.JPG)
DYK
editI've nominated this article at DYK. Schwede66 05:42, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
Requested move
edit- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the proposal was moved. --BDD (talk) 21:21, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Sam Johnson (New Zealand) → Sam Johnson (activist) – The current dab 'New Zealand' is not a good descriptor. As per Wikipedia:NCPDAB, the "disambiguator is usually a noun indicating what the person is noted for being." Well, Johnson is not a New Zealand. It's not clear cut whether he would best be described as a politician (he's a community board member) or a community activist, or simply activist, hence this formal move request. Schwede66 19:11, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
- Support and add to Samuel Johnson (disambiguation) In ictu oculi (talk) 02:51, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
- Support per nom. Not a New Zealand. However, I'm dubious as to whether this individual is notable enough for an article anyway. Looks a bit like fancruft to me. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:46, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
- Don't worry about notability. He's an absolute household name in New Zealand, which for a 24-year-old politician is rather unusual. The other day, he (as a right winger) was asked by a senior left wing MP to be her running mate for the Christchurch mayoralty. He would have been a shoe-in; people and the media were rather disappointed when he declined to stand (has to finish his tertiary education). There wouldn't be that much fuss about somebody who isn't notable. Schwede66 18:23, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.