Talk:Sam Nunn

Latest comment: 4 years ago by 2A02:1810:241F:FC00:B53B:7CD4:458A:AE0A in topic katje

Remove Paragraph

edit

The third paragraph in "Post-Congressional life" appears to be a misplaced meta-comment and should probably be removed. It reads:

"Footnote 15 does not support the statement--it merely links to an index: His approach to national security issues has been guided by one fundamental criteria: What Sam Nunn believes is in the best interest of the United States of America. [15]" —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.66.87.240 (talk) 16:39, 23 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Writing Style

edit

The writing in the article shows a poor grasp of the English language and needs to be improved. The Early Life secion is choppy at best, and could use a bit of refining. As for the content, I am sure we can find a bit more to write about such a well-known figure.Mrathel (talk) 13:31, 28 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Secion? DouglasHeld (talk) 19:07, 25 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Copyvio?

edit

Much of this page looks like its ripped from: http://www.nti.org/b_aboutnti/b1b.html. ElBenevolente 03:01, 18 Mar 2004 (UTC)

I wanted to say the same thing as ElB. It strikes me as a possible weakness of Wikipedia - an ideologue may fill most of a stub (or: a average person may fill most of a stub with CTRL+V from an ideologue's web site), and subsequent editors - if there are any other editors at all - proceed to make only minor changes. 212.183.107.22 04:17, 13 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

Nobel Peace Prize nomination

edit
  • Although the committee which awards the Nobel Peace Prize does not reveal official nominees, both Nunn and Lugar have been mentioned several times as candidates for the award in the media circle.

Being nominated for the Peace Prize is an honor, but it is not official or even prestigious. Any national legislator or about a third of the university professors in the world can make a nomination, and there have been as many as 140 some years. Nominators are requested to keep their nominations secret, so it's only those wishing publicity who make announcements, and more often it is impossible to verify. I see no reason to keep it. No offense to the subject, this is a general Nobel Peace Prize "nominees" issue. -Will Beback · · 08:08, 21 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Businessman?

edit

Uncited. The article contains no information about his "business" life. I'm replacing "businessman" with "lawyer" in the first sentence. 198.49.180.40 (talk) 23:06, 19 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

1972?

edit

Did Nunn actually take office on election day in 1972 as his info box alleges?

Shouldn't it say January 1973?--Utahredrock (talk) 02:33, 17 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

I suspect the date is correct, since per the congressional biography [1] he entered the Senate through a special election to replace Richard Russell, Jr. who had died in office. So Nunn was elected directly into a vacant seat rather than to replace an incumbent outgoing senator. It's therefore logical if Nunn took office immediately. Better sourcing and explanation of the Nunn's election (and why he later chose not to run again in 1996) would be helpful to the article. 207.241.239.70 (talk) 08:24, 27 February 2009 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Sam Nunn. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 23:19, 18 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Sam Nunn. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:36, 3 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

katje

edit

kaaaaaaaaaaaaaatje — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:1810:241F:FC00:B53B:7CD4:458A:AE0A (talk) 11:57, 25 October 2020 (UTC)Reply