Talk:Sam Parnia
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Dovmiester in topic Can someone please elaborate on this heavy statement?
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Sam Parnia article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 60 days |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Can someone please elaborate on this heavy statement?
editI'm sure I'm not the only one that's intrigued but unsatisfied by this:
"The experience was not compatible with an illusion, imaginary event or hallucination since visual (other than of ceiling shelves' images) and auditory awareness could be corroborated"
Like what visual and auditory awareness was corroborated? Was it something possible to accidentally guess? Dovmiester (talk) 12:33, 6 September 2023 (UTC)