This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Sam Powell-Pepper is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
There's a lot wrong with the suggested photo from a technical point of view (which happens a fair bit when cropping the non-focal point of an image), some of these things include it's out of focus, the white balance/colour is wrong due to not being the focal point, high ISO impacting subject in image and so on. Two main factors should be looked at for an image and that's technical and visual composition. The player is still identifiable in the current image and far outweighs the suggested image from a technical point of view; the visual composition in the suggested image doesn't outweigh the current image to the same extent of the technical aspect in the previous sentence. When a better photo emerges in the future (technical and/or visual composition wise), then the current one can be replaced if desired, but at the moment there isn't one (including the suggested image). Flickerd (talk) 05:49, 19 July 2017 (UTC)Reply
.svg){kind=logo}
