Talk:Sam Roberts (singer-songwriter)
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
NPOV
editI may be wrong, but it does seem that this article is slightly biased towards giving an overly stated view on the sucess of Sam Roberts. What does everyone else think? --Manik52 10:07, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
- I think so. The article seems to have a pretty positive spin but not to the extent of presenting information that is blatantly false. Some statements like "his first single "Brother Down" became one of the biggest Canadian hits of the year" seem to be exaggerating slightly. As far as I know "Where Have All the Good People Gone?" was his first big Canadian "hit" and it was far from the biggest of the year. Sam Roberts does not appear to be considered a major act in the prairies. It seems believable that he might be bigger in Quebec. I'm not sure if it is truly NPOV or not - quoting quantifiable data such as album sales or weeks of radio play would probrably be more appropriate than a subjective measure of how "big" Sam Roberts is. 216.36.186.2 (talk) 19:20, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
Picture
editI think someone can do a better job with his bio picture. Don't you think? ——The preceding unsigned comment was added by 72.138.169.23 (talk • contribs) 08:44, August 10, 2006 (UTC-5)
- If you can find a better, freely-licensed photo, by all means upload it. —Chowbok 14:49, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
- The picture that was added was not freely-licensed, so I have reverted. —Chowbok 20:37, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
That picture is disturbing, he looks like a horse- big open nostrils, veins popping out of his neck —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.49.5.174 (talk • contribs) 23:46, 1 March 2007
- I'm sick of everyone complaining. We can use any of these photos, so if you want to upload one, feel free. —Chowbok ☠ 18:46, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
Sam Roberts' Looks
editI'm not sure that this the following excerpt is particularly accurate or conforms to NPOV. Seems a bit like vandalism to me, tbh.
All band mates find it wise to look like Sam. Sam and his good looks have become a curse to all band mates and fans across the globe.
Any thoughts? Illu45 (talk) 21:20, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
- Yeah, it's vandalism, added by 99.234.155.59 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) -- Scorpion0422 01:26, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
Sources
editOne reference for this article? I'm sure we can do better. I'll try to work on it but anyone contributing to this article should be ashamed. He's gotten fairly huge and so sources should be easy to come by. Beach drifter (talk) 05:44, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Sam Roberts. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100713032351/http://radio3.cbc.ca/ to http://radio3.cbc.ca/
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.rounder.com/artist/news/detail.aspx?nid=4558&aid=97806 - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081230005305/http://www.muchmusic.com/events/mmva08/nominees/ to http://www.muchmusic.com/events/mmva08/nominees/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:42, 5 September 2017 (UTC)