Talk:Sam Zoldak

Latest comment: 8 years ago by MWright96 in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Sam Zoldak/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: MWright96 (talk · contribs) 13:19, 8 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Reviewing this article. MWright96 (talk) 13:19, 8 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

Early life and career

edit
  • Wikilink Eastern District High School and captalize the start of the third and fourth words in the school's name
  • Should semi-pro be changed to semi-professional?
  • Who was Connie Mack?

Major league career

edit
  • "and was used as a reliever his first season," - add either "in" or "during" in this statement

Later life

edit
  • "he was traded to the Philadelphia Athletics along with Ray Murray in a trade that also involved the Chicago White Sox." - repititon of the word trade

References

edit

Good work so far. On hold MWright96 (talk) 18:47, 8 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Issues all fixed, thanks for the review. As an aside, if you think the three-way trade part would be better with the entire trade included I could try to add that. I usually do, but since it involved three teams and seven players I thought it'd be overkill since he didn't play with any of them outside of Murray. Wizardman 00:50, 9 August 2016 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for the clarification. I found no remaining issues and I am happy to pass this. MWright96 (talk) 06:17, 9 August 2016 (UTC)Reply