Talk:Samkon Gado
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article has been mentioned by a media organization:
|
Christian Okoye
editCan anyone provide a source on the fact he wears number 35 because of Christian Okoye?--Alhutch 07:35, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
- I can see that he probably does wear the number 35 because of Okoye, but a google search turns up no mention of the nickname "God". I'm removing it until someone can provide a verifiable source.--Alhutch 07:40, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
- Check the official packers.com bio of Gado - confirms he wears the number to honor Okoye. Kybard 07:46, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
GADO HURT?
editDid Samkon suffer a season-ending injury last night on the MNF game against the Ravens? --Teenwriter 21:31, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
Gado will likely remain the 2006 starting running back?
editIt's somewhat understandable given the uncertainty at the position at the time of edit, but the 2006 "preview" sounds quite a bit of biased wishful-thinking imho. Even before the re-signing of Ahman Green, not very many would have penciled in Gado as the likely starter given the new staff, cap space, and possible vaccancies at the position.
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Samkon Gado. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061017213951/http://www.packers.com/news/releases/2006/09/13/1/ to http://packers.com/news/releases/2006/09/13/1/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080705172848/http://www.rototimes.com/nfl/player/6056 to http://www.rototimes.com/nfl/player/6056
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090307011217/http://www.stlouisrams.com/team/players/69543/ to http://www.stlouisrams.com/team/players/69543/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:08, 15 January 2018 (UTC)