Talk:Samsung Focus

Learn more about this page

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Samsung Focus article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Telecommunications

	Telecommunication portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Telecommunications, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Telecommunications on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TelecommunicationsWikipedia:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTemplate:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTelecommunications articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Technology

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles

Microsoft Windows: Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Microsoft Windows, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Microsoft Windows on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Microsoft WindowsWikipedia:WikiProject Microsoft WindowsTemplate:WikiProject Microsoft WindowsMicrosoft Windows articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing (assessed as Low-importance).

Brands

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that an image or photograph of Samsung Focus be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Untitled

The specs are wrong, this is not a "slider phone".

improper article

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I don't think this article is written in an encyclopedic Fashion and seems to be an advertisement. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.217.86.101 (talk) 18:11, 4 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Possible inappropriate quotation

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The quotation in the review section "Gizmodo stated 'If you're going to get a Windows Phone that isn't the HD7, this is the one to get, thanks to the display, if nothing else.' They also said 'I really can't tell you frantically enough how magically the Super AMOLED screen complements Windows Phone 7's interface. It's like dark chocolate peanut butter cups topped with blowjobs.'" I am not very familiar with Gizmodo, and I wasn't able to find the review (which conveniently was not cited in the article), but I am not sure about the "dark chocolate peanut butter cups topped with blowjobs" part. If it was actually said in a review, it seems rather unencyclopedic to include that quotation, particularly uncited. 99.163.105.163 (talk) 23:09, 27 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Samsung Focus.jpg Nominated for Deletion

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

	An image used in this article, File:Samsung Focus.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Deletion requests June 2011 What should I do?
	A discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs. This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 16:55, 7 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:ATT i917-Cetus front1 400x400.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

An image used in this article, File:ATT i917-Cetus front1 400x400.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 17:24, 22 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Add topic