Talk:Samsung Galaxy Note 20
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 |
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:52, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
“Design” or “Exterior”?
editShould the section about the design/exterior of the device be named “Design” or “Exterior”? --84.147.37.179 (talk) 10:27, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Chipset disparity
editA section (perhaps under the Reception heading) about the disparity between the Exynos 990 system-on-chip found in Western markets (excluding the US) and the Snapdragon 865+ is probably warranted. The Exynos 990 performed significantly worse than the Snapdragon 865 in the Galaxy S20 series. With the update to Snapdragon chipset, that gap is only about to get worse. Might be better to wait for more benchmarking to be done, but it’s already become a pretty huge story, and Samsung will probably be addressing it in the 2021 models (S21 and Note 21). Imaginestigers (talk) 22:19, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
- Including opinions on the subject is important, but the neutrality of the article could be potentially compromised if editors are not careful. With that said, here are some relevant links. Ghostofakina (talk) 21:52, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
Note20 vs Note 20
editIf the Note20 is now "stylized and marketed as Samsung Galaxy Note20 and Galaxy Note20 Ultra" (Note20 | samsung.com), why's it overridden as "Note 20" in the article? —Diblidabliduu (talk) 17:42, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
question
editwhy dont articles feature a dimension diagonal in inches, which is standard measure? this is ridicuolous! renders article completely USELESS — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.198.204.144 (talk) 21:53, 13 February 2024 (UTC)