Talk:Samsung Galaxy Note 3

Edits by User: Ausgoth

Hi I have noticed contributions by User:Ausgoth which seemed to be erroneous and redundant in which he insists on despite warnings and reminders to use the talk page first. He insists on his edits despite the majority of the users agree that most of his inputs are either redundant or erroneous and his reverts are incorrectly classified. I hope we could reach a consensus on what to do with this user as he already tends to disrupt and downgrade the article, Thanks! JeromesandilanicoJSD (talk) 14:39, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

Edit war

There has been a dispute on this article for over a week new. Rather than issue blocks, I've fully-protected this page and have invited those involved to participate; I do not usually fully-protect articles that I've made a few edits to but I would prefer to have a discussion. My protection is not an endorsement of the current version. Acalamari 11:44, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

First and foremost I would like to thank Acalamari for the page protection as Ausgoth seem to edit the article at his own pleasure despite majority of the users agree on reverting his edits which are either erroneous and/or redundant. Blocks and warnings have been implemented towards him and despite all of that after it expired, he just returns back to his old ways by reverting those edits by other users and puts back all his edits which the majority does not agree with causing a one versus all war on the article which was not present prior to his first edit in the article. Users such as ViperSnake151 would agree on me with this one as he also reverts all of the edits by Ausgoth due to similar arguments about Ausgoth's edits. Hope we could reach a consensus not only regarding the article, but also with User:Ausgoth and the disruption he is making in the article. JeromesandilanicoJSD (talk) 11:57, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

• Firstly, the model numbers in the body like that are just useless cruft. I have objections to those full-on tables of models simply because I think they violate the "Wikipedia is not a catalog" rule, but everyone who objects to me cries it's useful. Now, on the stuff about the lockout; I don't get what his problem with the sourcing is; and I have seen no other source actually make the assertion about the lockout system that this random Russian site is making. ViperSnake151  Talk  15:14, 26 October 2013 (UTC)

The Note 3 is compatible with the Note 2 Smart Dock

While Samsung has not promoted the fact that the Samsung Smart Dock for the Note 2 works with the new Note 3, the Smart Dock does indeed work with the Note 3. This extends the power of Note 3, transforming it into a mini desktop.

See the test by a youtube user here:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lWN43pnkg0s

Samsung Galaxy Note 3 works with the Note 2 Smart Dock — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jay8484 (talk • contribs)

Original research. Needs a reliable secondary source. ViperSnake151  Talk  22:18, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

Edit 703742518

This was not my edit. I logged off my account from my brothers computer, but then, somehow I was logged in again without entering login details! (Server cache problem?) He saved this edit using my account! That was not my edit. --S536870912 (talk) 15:52, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

But I agree with him. As a power user, I dream of having a smartphone that covers the full feature range of all other smartphones and predecessors. --S536870912 (talk) 22:33, 7 February 2016 (UTC)