Talk:Samuel J. Briskin

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Wikicology in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Samuel J. Briskin/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Wikicology (talk · contribs) 09:37, 7 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for this GA nomination, Onel5969. I will go through the article in details later today. I might be a bit slow with this review. If you think I'm too slow and that is likely to be a problem, please let me know as soon as possible. I'm an extremely slow reviewer but my aim is always to pass rather than fail; I would rather push to improve an article rather than simply fail the review. I will normally help with minor improvement rather than listing them here. Anything more significant than minor improvements, I will raise here. I see the reviewer's role as collaborative and collegiate, so I welcome discussion regarding interpretation of the GA criteria. Wikigyt@lk to M£ 09:37, 7 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Tick box

edit

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose is clear and concise, without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:  
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:  
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?  
    A. Has an appropriate reference section:  
    B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:  
    C. No original research:  
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:  
    B. Focused:  
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:  
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:  
    B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:  

Comments on GA criteria

edit
Pass
Query
Fail

Pass

edit

This is an informative and helpful article on an important film producer. Passed as meeting Good Article criteria. Congratulations!

General comments

edit