Talk:Samuel Merrill Woodbridge/GA1

Latest comment: 11 years ago by Cwmhiraeth in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs) 09:36, 19 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

I propose to take on this review and will examine the article in detail in the next couple of days. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:36, 19 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

First reading

edit

In general this article is well-written and seems to cover the main aspects of Rev. Woodbridge's life and career. A few points I noticed:

  • Some more wikilinking is required for such words as ecclesiastical, theology, sermon, pastor, seminary, faculty, Dutch Reformed Church, synod, pastoral, didactic, polemic
  • "His earliest ancestor, Rev. John Woodbridge (b. 1493) was a follower of John Wycliffe." - This was not really his first ancestor.
  • "While a student at New York University, Woodridge was a member of the secretive, all-male Eucleian Society and be elected to Phi Beta Kappa" - This sentence is not quite right and I don't think it needs to repeat the full name of the university.
  • Done (20SEP13), rephrased as "As an undergraduate student..."
  • "In December 1857, Rev. Woodbridge was appointed to the faculty of two schools in New Brunswick, New Jersey-—for 44 years as a professor of ecclesiastical history ..." - I'm sure he was not appointed for a 44 year term so maybe add "he was to serve 44 years" or somesuch.
  • "During his career, Rev. Woodbridge would receive honorary degrees ..." - Here and elsewhere I would have used a direct construction "During his career, Rev. Woodbridge received honorary degrees ..." but I daresay that is a matter of personal preference in literary style.
  • The word "synod" needs consistency in capitalisation.
  • "According to Corwin, ..." - Perhaps you could add a phrase explaining who Corwin was.
  • Done (20SEP13) - identified him as a church historian.

GA Criteria

edit
  • 1a The article is well written.
  • 1b The article conforms with the MOS guidelines.
  • 2a&b The article is well referenced and has inline citations in an acceptable form for all contentious statements.
  • 2c There is no original research as far as I can see.
  • 3a&b The coverage is broad enough and the article does not include irrelevant material.
  • 4 The article is neutral.
  • 5 The article was created by the nominator recently and has hardly been edited by anybody else.
  • 6 The images are either in the public domain, having been created over one hundred years ago, or are appropriately licensed.
  • 7 The images are relevant to the topic and have suitable captions.
  • Overall assessment - Pass. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 04:56, 21 September 2013 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.