Talk:Samurai Jack/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 21:16, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Expect comments by the end of the week. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 21:16, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

Infobox and lead

• Non-free rationale for the title card looks good.
• Every genre should be sourced.
• Running time also needs a source.
• Was the series originally created for Adult Swim?
• "shapshifting" → "shapeshifting"
• "about deal the" → "about to deal the"
• Are there several "ways" Jack can return or can it be changed to "way"?
• Remove the comma after "critical acclaim".

Premise

• Add commas after "the land" and "jungles".

Episodes

• This section looks good.

Production

• Add commas after "Lawrence of Arabia" and "total, Tartakovsky".
• The reference after "bushido code" moved to 46:44 when clicked. The timestamp is already enough so make it link to the start of the video.

Conclusion and revival

• Change all uses of "live action" to "live-action"
• Add a comma after "and eventually".
• The last two sentences in this section need sources.

Reception

Critical reception

• Is the quote block necessary? Vulture doesn't seem like that much of a source for a quote block.
• Can this section be expanded a little bit (2-5 more reviews)?

Awards and nominations

• Instead of skipping a line and making the text small, add in normal size "(for "[Episode]")" to the nominees (example 1 and example 2).
• What is the purpose of the sentence at the bottom of this section? Can it be moved or removed?

Other media

• "released October 23" → "released on October 23"
• Add commas after "Nintendo Switch" and "Jack, the Scotsman".

References

• Archive all sources (either manually or this tool).
• For Rotten Tomatoes, might I recommend this template?

Progress

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

Notes

• @Paper Luigi: It has been around a week since I put this article on hold. If my suggestions are not addressed, I'm sadly going to have to fail this article due to your absence. I'm giving you until 00:00, 20 March 2021 (UTC) to respond or I'm going to have to fail it per WP:GAN/I#R3. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 00:26, 19 March 2021 (UTC)