Talk:San Bernardino Associated Governments

Latest comment: 7 years ago by TonyBallioni in topic Requested move 27 March 2017

Requested move 27 March 2017

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved. (non-admin closure) TonyBallioni (talk) 20:53, 11 April 2017 (UTC)Reply


San Bernardino Associated GovernmentsSBCTA – Agency Changed name [1]

References

108.184.113.46 (talk) 07:16, 27 March 2017 (UTC) --Relisting. TonyBallioni (talk) 20:22, 4 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

based on this article, http://www.vvdailypress.com/news/20170319/bear-valley-bike-path-complete

it sounds like the transportation division was renamed. I am going to have to look at the the minutes/agenda from SANBAG to see what has happened. From the sounds of it, it sounds like sanbag is dead as an agency since it was two thing according to their about page:

  • known as SANBAG, is the council of governments and transportation planning agency for San Bernardino County. SANBAG is responsible for cooperative regional planning and furthering an efficient multi-modal transportation system countywide. SANBAG serves the 2.1 million residents of San Bernardino County.
  • As the County Transportation Commission, SANBAG supports freeway construction projects, regional and local road improvements, train and bus transportation, railroad crossings, call boxes, ridesharing, congestion management efforts and long-term planning studies. SANBAG administers Measure I, the half-cent transportation sales tax approved by county voters in 1989.

if it is two things, then should this page be updated as a defunct agency? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.184.116.132 (talk) 05:11, 30 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

  • Oppose. Instead start new articles on these new agencies if they are notable, and just update the existing article to point to the new articles and describe the demise of this one. And the new articles of course to point to this one and describe their relationships to it. Covers all bases. Andrewa (talk) 07:35, 4 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.