 | This article was nominated for deletion on 13 January 2017. The result of the discussion was keep. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
This article is being considered for deletion
editThis article is apparently marked for deletion, yet it mentions San Serriffe, article that exists for more than 13 years. You can see the obvious? If San Serriffe exists for 13 years, then anyone who wants to delete this article, but didn't mark San Serriffe for deletion is just hypocrite. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SanEscobar (talk • contribs) 07:30, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
- @SanEscobar: Yes, you're right. BTW, the resolution was keep, so it's OK. --RezonansowyakaRezy (talk | contribs) 20:29, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
Merge?
editAn error. A funny error that caught the fancy of the media; briefly. Three months later it looks like a classic WP:NOTNEWS, encyclopedic topic. I tagged it for notability, but it probably makes sense to merge it to a short section on Witold Waszczykowski.E.M.Gregory (talk) 22:33, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
- It's fine the way it is IMO. I removed the notability template you placed because it doesn't apply. There are 18 refs, many in depth, to the Le Journal de Montréal and the New York Times and Gazeta Wyborcza and other major publications. So it already meets the WP:GNG. That doesn't mean it can't be deleted on other grounds. But the notability tag is not for "I, personally, think this article is silly" or whatever. It's for articles that don't meet the GNG. Herostratus (talk) 09:59, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
Just a question
edit@Altenmann, Hi, I am the translator of the page on the french wikipedia and i would know if it's possible to find the original page because I learn here : https://wyborcza.pl/7,75398,21230101,san-escobar-jest-juz-wszedzie-o-nowym-sojuszniku-polski-od.html?disableRedirects=true that a page was created but deleted... Yuilo (talk) 06:46, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Yuilo: How are you going to use the old version? - Altenmann >talk 08:37, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- I would like to put the link on the french version. So when I talk about this page : Pendant un certain temps, Wikipédia a publié un article complet sur le pays, avec son nombre d'habitants, sa capitale (Santo Subito) people can go on and read it (i don't know if i am clear or not, If you don't understand me, tell me and I will use a translator) Yuilo (talk) 09:02, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- You cannot put a link to a deleted page. It is... er... deleted. - Altenmann >talk 09:14, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- I would like to put the link on the french version. So when I talk about this page : Pendant un certain temps, Wikipédia a publié un article complet sur le pays, avec son nombre d'habitants, sa capitale (Santo Subito) people can go on and read it (i don't know if i am clear or not, If you don't understand me, tell me and I will use a translator) Yuilo (talk) 09:02, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Materialscientist:: 18:39, January 10, 2017 Materialscientist talk contribs deleted page San Escobar (G3: Blatant hoax)
- Can you help here? - Altenmann >talk 08:37, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
By the way, Yulio, I am going to nominate the map you uploaded to Commons for deletion. You cannot copy images from websites to Commons. This is copyright violation and against the law. - Altenmann >talk 08:37, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- and, on the map, we can read : Creative Commons attributions-Noncommercial 4.0. Yuilo (talk) 09:03, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, noncommercial meand Wikipedia cannot use it. - Altenmann >talk 09:11, 26 June 2024 (UTC)